Tax is a very unique form of state funding, local government, and, in part, social security funds. Since it consists of the compulsory and, on the other hand, direct exchange-free, deduction of a fraction of the resources of a person or firm, there must be sufficient reason to accept the pay.
And the strong way, which has often been used in the past, is not enough to explain that such an institution has been able to continue through the centuries and that generations of taxpayers have more or less satisfied with their tax debt. Of course, there have been many revolts against the tax authorities in history, but these were aimed at a specific levy or a collector, more rarely a political power, without calling into question the principle of taxation. This can be seen as a product of long-standing addiction to the idea that taxation is necessary and that in the end everyone makes a profit despite the inconveniences it represents. You will find the best support from the Tax agent Watson now.
In this case, the tax would benefit from implied consent. It should be noted, however, that its legitimacy would remain fragile if it were not based on explicit consent enshrined in legal formalization.
The latter assumes that the lifting of the levy is explicitly accepted by those on whom the charge falls or by their representatives. It is therefore primarily political in scope. It is he who bases the modern legitimacy of the tax and which is translated on the level of the legal principles by the principle of legality tax, in other words by the fact that the creation, the deletion or modification of a tax can be decided only in the context of a law, which can be a finance or an ordinary law. The right Tax agent Watson is there now.
This principle proceeds, in the light of Enlightenment thought, of a conception which considers the citizen as a rational being, concerned for the common good and aware that, through the consent of the tax expressed by his representatives, he is his own consent that expresses himself.
And the strong way, which has often been used in the past, is not enough to explain that such an institution has been able to continue through the centuries and that generations of taxpayers have more or less satisfied with their tax debt. Of course, there have been many revolts against the tax authorities in history, but these were aimed at a specific levy or a collector, more rarely a political power, without calling into question the principle of taxation. This can be seen as a product of long-standing addiction to the idea that taxation is necessary and that in the end everyone makes a profit despite the inconveniences it represents. You will find the best support from the Tax agent Watson now.
In this case, the tax would benefit from implied consent. It should be noted, however, that its legitimacy would remain fragile if it were not based on explicit consent enshrined in legal formalization.
- Thus two forms of fiscal consent must be distinguished: consent to tax and consent to tax. Consent to taxation, that is, acceptance of principle, is above all sociological in nature. It originates in the oldest folds of humanity. Fruit of a long process of maturing social relations, it comes from the most distant origins of taxation born of economic, political and religious determinisms, intervening most often against a backdrop of violence, but also of exchanges. It was by occupying a structuring function of social relations that taxation, whether by force or by force, was gradually able to be admitted and give concrete form to the consent of the tax.
The latter assumes that the lifting of the levy is explicitly accepted by those on whom the charge falls or by their representatives. It is therefore primarily political in scope. It is he who bases the modern legitimacy of the tax and which is translated on the level of the legal principles by the principle of legality tax, in other words by the fact that the creation, the deletion or modification of a tax can be decided only in the context of a law, which can be a finance or an ordinary law. The right Tax agent Watson is there now.
This principle proceeds, in the light of Enlightenment thought, of a conception which considers the citizen as a rational being, concerned for the common good and aware that, through the consent of the tax expressed by his representatives, he is his own consent that expresses himself.
